TTR-2026 · The Tech Readiness™ · v4.1.0

The Standard

A uniform, repeatable audit methodology for the maturity of a software development process. Technology-agnostic. Comparable cycle over cycle. Open standard — CC BY-ND 4.0.

Published by Tech Pulse Sp. z o.o. · Open standard — CC BY-ND 4.0 · Technology-agnostic · Comparable cycle over cycle
00 Who is it for

Is TTR-2026 right for you?

The standard applies to organizations with a software-based product that is past its initial release and in active development. You need a defined strategic goal — scaling, fundraising, enterprise sales, or crisis management — and an identifiable team or vendor responsible for development.

Qualification criteria
01
Software-based product — SaaS, mobile app, API, platform.
02
Past initial release — deployed in production, accessible to end-users.
03
Active development — in-house team, outsourced vendor, or hybrid model.
04
Strategic goal — fundraising, enterprise sales, scaling, or crisis management.
01 How the audit works

Five steps. One methodology.

Every TTR-2026 audit follows the same structured procedure — from verifying that the standard applies to your organization, through evidence collection and scoring, to a board-ready report.

Step 1 — Scope Qualification

Before any audit begins, the Auditor verifies that the organization and product meet all mandatory criteria: a software-based product, past initial release, in active development, with a defined strategic goal.

What gets verified:
  • • Is the product a software application (SaaS, app, API, platform)?
  • • Is it deployed in production and accessible to end-users?
  • • Is there an identifiable team or vendor responsible for development?
  • • Does the organization have a defined strategic goal?
01b Business Impact Indicators

Every finding becomes a business number.

The standard defines 7 categories of Business Impact Indicators (BII) that translate technical audit findings into financial, temporal and operational measures. Each indicator answers a specific business question — so the CTO speaks the same language as the CFO.

OE
Operating Efficiency

Where is our money going?

OE-01 Innovation Tax
OE-02 Cloud Waste Ratio
OE-03 Deployment Friction
OE-04 Support Escalation Drain
OE-05 Manual Operations Dependency
OE-06 Data Reconciliation Overhead
DP
Delivery Performance

How fast are we shipping?

DP-01 Plan Attainment
DP-02 Commitment Reliability
DP-03 Lead Time for Changes (DORA)
DP-04 Time to Market
DP-05 Deployment Frequency (DORA)
DP-06 Change Failure Rate (DORA)
DP-07 Mean Time to Restore (DORA)
PV
Product Validation

Are we shipping the right things?

PV-01 Unused Feature Cost
PV-02 Decision-to-Validation Latency
PV-03 Product Signal Blackout Cost
PV-04 Experiment Deficit
RL
Remediation Liability

What must we fix?

RL-01 Compliance Readiness Gap
RL-02 Vendor Lock-in Escape Cost
RL-03 Security Remediation Debt
RL-04 Total Defect Liability
CE
Cost Exposure

What could hit us?

CE-01 Outage Exposure
CE-02 Breach Cost Exposure
CE-03 SLA Credit Exposure
TC
Team Capacity

Are we building on solid people-foundations?

TC-01 Onboarding Waste
TC-02 Team Turnover Cost
TC-03 Key-Person Concentration Cost
CR
Capacity Runway

When do we run out of room?

CR-01 Scalability Ceiling
CR-02 Capacity Utilization
02 What gets audited

Nine domains. Two halves.

Control Points are grouped into nine Domains, each producing its own Readiness Score and Level — so findings are actionable at a granular level, not just as one headline number.

Context — the environment work happens in
GOV
Governance & Legal

IP ownership, licensing, vendor risk, GDPR, exit strategy.

SEC
Security

AppSec, IAM & MFA, vulnerability management, hardening, incident response.

TEAM
Team & Organization

Topology, role clarity, onboarding, KPIs, knowledge, retention.

AI
AI & Tooling

AI-assisted dev, leverage readiness, model governance, agentic orchestration.

OPS
Operational Support

Support tooling, user docs, monitoring, on-call, data integrity.

Process — how software is built
SWE
Software Engineering

Version control, branching, code review, architecture, technical debt.

QE
Quality Engineering

Test strategy, automation coverage, defect management, release quality.

INF
Infrastructure & Operations

CI/CD, environments, IaC, observability, reliability & recovery.

PMD
Project Mgmt & Delivery

Planning, estimation, roadmap discipline, stakeholder reporting.

03 Calibrated to your stage

One score means different things at different stages.

The Auditor assigns one of four Audit Profiles based on your strategic goal. The profile re-weights the matrix — so what’s critical for a launch isn’t what’s critical for an enterprise sale.

Enterprise

Security, trust, compliance and high availability — for landing enterprise & government clients.

Rescue

Stabilization, tech-debt recovery and risk mitigation when the platform is a liability.

Growth

Scaling efficiency, automation and bottleneck removal during rapid expansion.

Launch

Core functionality, market validation and critical-blocker identification, lean.

Readiness Levels — derived from the score
A
Elite
90–100
B
Stable
75–89
C
Warning
60–74
D
Fragile
40–59
F
Critical
0–39

Ready to see where you stand?

Book a 30-minute scoping call. We’ll verify if TTR-2026 fits your organization and define the audit scope.

Projekt dofinansowany z Funduszy Europejskich